Suing a Texas City: The Tort Claims Act Notice Trap

The Texas Tort Claims Act is the reason a Texas city can be sued at all. Cities carry governmental immunity by default. Chapter 101 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code waives that immunity, but only for specific kinds of injuries. That waiver comes bundled with a catch most injured claimants never see coming. A short, mandatory notice deadline runs on its own clock. It’s separate from the two-year window most people assume covers any Texas injury claim. Miss the notice deadline, and a claim can be barred before a judge ever reaches the facts.

What the Texas Tort Claims Act Actually Covers

The Texas Tort Claims Act doesn’t open the courthouse door for every complaint against a city. Texas cities carry governmental immunity by default, and Chapter 101 waives it only for a few categories of claims. One category covers injury caused by a motor vehicle a city employee was driving on duty. Another covers injury caused by a dangerous condition on city property, like a broken sidewalk or an unmarked hole. Outside those categories, and a handful of others the statute lists, immunity generally stays intact.

In North Texas, that usually means DART buses, city vehicles, and municipal property. Sidewalks, parks, and public buildings all fall under that second category. A pedestrian struck by a city vehicle can fall under that waiver. So can a park visitor hurt by unsafe playground equipment. The Act’s notice rule applies just as much to counties and school districts, but this article focuses on cities. That notice requirement in Section 101.101 sits right on top of the waiver. It’s not a separate hurdle — it’s the price of using the waiver at all.

How the Texas Tort Claims Act Notice Deadline Works

Section 101.101 of the Texas Tort Claims Act sets the statewide baseline. Written notice is due within six months of the date the incident occurred. It has to reasonably describe the injury, the time and place, and what actually happened. Six months looks generous next to the two-year deadline for an ordinary negligence claim. It’s not the same clock — the notice window runs first, and it runs out much faster.

Treating the two deadlines as interchangeable is a common way a city claim gets dismissed before discovery even opens. Anyone who wants to sue a city in Texas over an injury claim has to clear this notice step. One narrow exception exists. Subsection (c) waives formal notice if the city already has actual notice of the injury. That’s a high bar in practice. Courts generally require the city to know it was at fault, not just that an injury happened. Relying on that exception instead of filing formal written notice is a gamble most claimants shouldn’t take. Sending notice to the wrong department can fail to count, even inside the window. A private insurance claim form isn’t the same as formal written notice to the city.

Why a City’s Charter Can Set a Shorter Deadline

Section 101.101 doesn’t stop at six months — it also ratifies any charter provision that sets a shorter deadline. Home-rule cities across Texas use that authority differently. Houston’s charter, for example, requires written notice within 90 days of the injury, not six months. That’s a quarter of the statewide default, and Houston is far from the only city that trims the window. Fort Worth, San Antonio, and other home-rule cities can each set their own figure under that same charter authority. None of them are required to match Houston’s number, or each other’s.

The trap isn’t a single hidden number. It’s that the deadline shifts by city, and state law hands each home-rule city the authority to shift it. There’s no statewide list ranking these deadlines city by city. The only reliable source is that city’s own charter or municipal code. Most cities publish it through the city secretary’s office or an online code library.

What Dallas’s Own Charter Requires

Dallas is often assumed to run on a shortened deadline, but its own municipal code says otherwise. The city’s charter requires written notice within six months of the incident. That’s the same period Chapter 101 sets by default, not a shortened one. Dallas routes these claims through its Office of Risk Management, not the courts, at least at the notice stage.

That doesn’t mean Dallas is an easy case. Six months is still a short runway. A claimant has to identify the right city office, document the injury, and confirm its full extent. City risk managers move quickly once notice arrives. Physical evidence like broken pavement or surveillance footage doesn’t wait for a claimant to catch up. Anyone dealing with a different Texas city over an injury claim shouldn’t assume Dallas’s number applies there too. That distinction matters to anyone planning to sue a Texas city over an injury.

Houston runs on 90 days; Dallas runs on six months. The only way to know another city’s figure is to check that city’s own charter and code.

The bottom line

Sending timely notice doesn’t file the lawsuit itself. The Texas Tort Claims Act’s notice window and Texas’s two-year statute of limitations run on separate clocks. Missing the short municipal notice window kills otherwise valid claims all the time. It’s one of the most common reasons a claim against a city never gets evaluated on the facts. Dallas doesn’t shorten the state’s default, but that’s a fact about one city, not a rule for every city. The next city down the highway might run on 90 days instead of six months. Confirming the real deadline first is the only reliable way to keep a claim against a Texas city alive.

Keep reading: more Dallas-Fort Worth personal injury guides are in progress and will be linked here as they go live.

---

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Texas law changes, and how a court or insurer applies these rules to Texas tort claims act depends on the specific facts of a case. Nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship, and readers facing a real claim should confirm current deadlines and procedures directly rather than relying on this summary alone.