Being hit by a drunk driver in Arizona leaves you with injuries, anger, and a confusing split screen: the state prosecutes the driver in one courtroom while your own claim moves through a completely different process. The two are related, but they are not the same case, and mixing them up costs victims real options. Here is how the criminal DUI case and your civil claim fit together, what restitution can and cannot do, and where Arizona victims can find support.
Two cases, two courts
The criminal case belongs to the state. Prosecutors charge the driver, and the outcome is punishment: jail, fines, license consequences, treatment. You are the victim, not a party — you don’t control the charges or the plea.
The civil claim belongs to you. It seeks compensation for your medical bills, lost income, and pain, usually through the driver’s insurance. It moves on your timeline, under the ordinary rules of an at-fault state, and it does not wait for a criminal verdict. Importantly, the driver can be acquitted or plead down and you can still win the civil claim, because the burden of proof is lower.
Your rights while the criminal case runs
Arizona’s Victims’ Bill of Rights gives crime victims a formal role: the right to be notified of hearings, to be heard at sentencing, and to be treated with fairness and dignity. The Arizona Attorney General’s Office of Victim Services explains these rights and connects victims with local advocates. Organizations like MADD also offer free victim support, from court accompaniment to grief resources. You do not have to navigate the criminal process alone, and using these services costs you nothing.
What restitution covers — and what it doesn’t
As part of a criminal sentence, an Arizona judge can order the driver to pay restitution for your out-of-pocket economic losses. That can help. But restitution has hard limits. It only covers documented economic loss, not pain and suffering. It depends on the driver’s ability to pay, often in small installments. And it ends where the conviction ends.
That is why the civil claim exists. It reaches insurance money, and it values the full harm — including the human losses restitution never touches.
Punitive damages: when carelessness becomes something worse
Most injury claims involve ordinary negligence. Drunk driving can be different. Arizona law allows punitive damages when clear and convincing evidence shows a defendant consciously disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm to others — and courts have recognized that choosing to drive after heavy drinking can meet that standard. Punitive damages exist to punish and deter, and they sit on top of compensatory damages. They are never automatic, insurance often doesn’t pay them, and whether to pursue them is a strategic call. We’ll cover the concept in depth in a future guide to punitive damages in Arizona.
When the drunk driver has no insurance
Impaired drivers are, unsurprisingly, overrepresented among the uninsured. If that happens to you, your own policy may rescue the claim: uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage steps in when the at-fault driver can’t pay. Check your declarations page early. In some cases, a business that overserved an obviously intoxicated customer can also bear responsibility under Arizona’s dram shop law — and those claims carry their own short deadline, so raise the question quickly.
What to do now
Get medical care first and follow through with treatment. Request the police report, which will document the impairment evidence. Save every bill and receipt. Be careful talking to the driver’s insurer — the basics in our guide on what to do after a car accident in Phoenix apply doubly here. And register as a victim in the criminal case so the notifications come to you.
The bottom line
If you were hit by a drunk driver in Arizona, two processes start at once. Let the state handle punishment, and use your victim rights to stay informed. Then protect the claim that is actually yours: document everything, check your UM coverage, and get advice before accepting any offer. The driver made the choice. The recovery, at least, can be on your terms.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. The civil claim is separate from the criminal DUI case and does not have to wait for it. A civil claim can even succeed if the driver is acquitted, because the burden of proof is lower.
No. Restitution only covers documented out-of-pocket economic losses and depends on the driver’s ability to pay. It does not compensate pain and suffering — that is what the civil claim is for.
Your own uninsured motorist (UM) coverage can pay the claim if you carry it. In some cases, a bar or restaurant that overserved the driver may also share responsibility under Arizona’s dram shop law.
They can be. Arizona allows punitive damages on clear and convincing evidence that the driver consciously disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm, and drunk driving can meet that standard. They are never automatic.
Find the right attorney for what you’re facing.
Independent and free — matched to your situation, not to whoever advertises loudest.
Get MatchedKeep reading: UM/UIM coverage: the most important insurance you’re not thinking about · Arizona is an at-fault state · or browse all guides from Awesome Attorneys.
This article is general information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney–client relationship. Criminal proceedings, restitution and punitive damages each turn on specific facts and evolving Arizona law. If you were injured by an impaired driver, please speak with a licensed Arizona attorney — and know that victim support services are free and available now.