Law Offices of Victor Knapp: Forty-Four Years Defending Queens, From Arraignment to the Parole Board

Attorney Advertising. The information on this profile does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading it. Past results described do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Victor Knapp has been defending the accused in Queens for more than four decades — long enough that his practice covers the parts of the criminal justice system most defense lawyers never touch: parole release applications argued at Rikers, extraditions, professional-license disciplinary matters, and the family-offense docket. Admitted in 1981 and to the United States Supreme Court in 1986, he works from Suite 323 at 125-10 Queens Boulevard, directly across from the borough’s Criminal Courthouse, and answers his own phone around the clock.

At a Glance

Firm	Law Offices of Victor Knapp
Principal Attorney	Victor Knapp
Office	125-10 Queens Boulevard, Suite 323, Kew Gardens, NY 11415 — opposite the Queens Criminal Courthouse
Focus	Federal and state criminal defense — assault, drug and gun possession, robbery, domestic violence, DWI, white-collar matters, through homicide and federal charges — plus parole and probation violations, parole release applications, extraditions, professional-license and disciplinary matters, and family offenses
Admissions	New York (1981); U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York (1981); U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; U.S. Supreme Court (1986)
Education	B.S. magna cum laude, St. John’s University (1976); J.D. magna cum laude, St. John’s University School of Law (1980); LL.M. in Intellectual Property, Cardozo School of Law (2001)
Fee Structure	Consultation by phone; listed as available 24 hours a day, seven days a week

Career History

Knapp took both his undergraduate and law degrees magna cum laude from St. John’s, was admitted in 1981, and has practiced criminal defense in Queens continuously since — a forty-four-year tenure that has made him, in the words of a decade-long repeat client, well known throughout the court system. Mid-career he added an LL.M. in Intellectual Property from Cardozo and an active entertainment-law sideline, serving on the New York City Bar’s Entertainment Law Committee and as a member of the Copyright Society — an unusual pairing we note as a matter of record. His directory profiles state he has won landmark cases and established case law through argued rulings that other practitioners draw on, a characterization we attribute to those profiles. He holds a Martindale-Hubbell peer-review rating for very high ethical standards and a Client Champion service award.

Practice Concentration

The core is criminal trial defense across the full spectrum, federal and state, from misdemeanors through homicide. What distinguishes the practice is its coverage of the system’s back half — the stages after conviction that most retail defense practices decline: parole and probation violation defense, parole release applications argued at Rikers and before state corrections parole boards, extradition matters, and the professional-license disciplinary proceedings that follow criminal charges for licensed professionals. The courthouse-opposite office and around-the-clock availability complete a practice built for Queens defendants at every procedural stage, with clients served across Brooklyn, Long Island, and the wider five-borough area.

Track Record

The verifiable record is durability and breadth: forty-four years of continuous Queens practice, federal and state trial work, and a repeat-client record spanning criminal and Supreme Court matters, parole proceedings at Rikers, and state parole-release applications across multiple counties. Reviews describe cases dismissed on the timeline Knapp predicted. His landmark-case and established-case-law characterizations are attributed as directory descriptions; the firm publishes no itemized dispositions ledger, and this research did not independently verify individual outcomes. Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future case.

Client Voice

The review record across platforms is substantially positive and specific. A repeat client of ten years described him as honest, knowledgeable, and effective across a wide variety of matters; another wrote that “he is a man of his word” — two cases, both dismissed, on the schedule promised. Reviewers repeatedly emphasize reachability: he picks up no matter the time. Per our disclosure policy, we also report the record’s harshest entry rather than omit it: one aggregator review alleges the reviewer paid and received nothing of value, with a demand for more money — an unverified allegation sharply at odds with the balance of the record, which prospective clients can raise directly. This research did not surface any public disciplinary findings across his forty-four years at the bar.

Beyond the Courtroom

Knapp’s bar service runs through the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (Entertainment Law Committee), the Queens County and New York State bar associations (including the Criminal Justice and Entertainment sections), the American Bar Association, the New York County Lawyers Association, and the Copyright Society. The parole-release practice itself is a form of second-chance work: representing incarcerated New Yorkers seeking release is among the least glamorous corners of criminal practice.

Recognition

Sorting per our standard: the Martindale-Hubbell peer-review rating for very high ethical standards is a peer-derived credential; the Client Champion award is a client-review-based recognition; both are categorized as such rather than as certification. The U.S. Supreme Court admission is a procedural credential held by a minority of practitioners. A disclosure we apply to every New York profile: New York State does not operate a board certification program for legal specialties comparable to the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, so no New York attorney profile on this site will describe its subject as a state-certified specialist, and this profile attributes no certification to Knapp.

New York Legal Backdrop

A New York criminal case moves on statutory clocks that defendants rarely know exist. After arrest, arraignment generally must occur within about twenty-four hours; a felony defendant held on bail must be released under CPL § 180.80 if the prosecution fails to secure grand jury action within the statutory period (120 hours, or 144 hours spanning a weekend or holiday). CPL § 30.30 sets speedy-trial clocks — six months on most felonies, ninety days on class A misdemeanors — and New York’s discovery reform, CPL Article 245, obligates prosecutors to turn over their evidence on an automatic timetable. CPL § 160.59 permits sealing of up to two eligible convictions after ten crime-free years. And the case does not end at sentencing: parole release, parole revocation, and probation violation proceedings run on their own rules with liberty equally at stake — the post-conviction terrain this practice expressly covers. None of this is legal advice; consult a licensed New York attorney about your situation.

Awesome Attorneys Assessment

The case for Knapp is full-lifecycle coverage from a courthouse-corridor veteran: forty-four years in the same borough’s courts, federal reach up to the Supreme Court bar, genuine post-conviction capability that most competitors lack, direct attorney access at any hour, and a repeat-client record that is the most honest testimonial a defense lawyer can accumulate.

The honest trade-offs, stated plainly: this is a solo practice late in a long career, with the capacity and continuity questions that raises for lengthy matters; there is no prosecutorial background in the record; the entertainment-law sideline means the practice is not exclusively criminal; the landmark-case claims are directory-attributed rather than independently documented; and the review record contains the one adverse allegation disclosed above.

Methodology & Sourcing

This profile was researched and written independently by Awesome Attorneys in August 2026 without the participation, sponsorship, or payment of the Law Offices of Victor Knapp. Primary sources: the attorney’s website (victorknapp.com), including its about and criminal-defense practice pages (office address; practice scope including parole, extradition, and license matters; four-decades experience framing). Independent verification: Lawyers.com/Martindale listing (1981 New York admission; 1986 U.S. Supreme Court admission; federal admissions; St. John’s degrees with honors; Cardozo LL.M.; bar memberships; peer-review and Client Champion recognitions); Yelp listing (32-years framing as of its date; office suite; 24/7 hours; practice scope); Avvo profile (30-plus-years framing; landmark-case characterization attributed above; peer endorsement); TopAttorney and FiveStarReviews aggregated client reviews, including the repeat-client accounts and the adverse review disclosed in Client Voice. Statutes cited in the New York Legal Backdrop were verified against the New York Criminal Procedure Law (§§ 30.30, 160.59, 180.80, and Article 245).

Publisher Disclosure & Independence Notice

Awesome Attorneys is an independent legal-directory publisher. This profile was not paid for by the Law Offices of Victor Knapp, and inclusion in our editorial coverage cannot be purchased. Our methodology and editorial standards are applied consistently across all firms we cover.