Attorney profile

Hach & Rose: The Union-Rooted Firm Behind an $11.7 Million Verdict for an NYPD Officer

Need a lawyer for something like this?

Tell us what happened and we’ll connect you with a law firm that handles cases like yours, fast. Free, no obligation.

Tell us what happened →

Our chat is not a message to the firm profiled here. Awesome Attorneys is independent and not a law firm; we pass your details on only with your permission.

Attorney Advertising. This profile is independent editorial content produced by Awesome Attorneys and is not a paid placement. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice or creates an attorney-client relationship. See our Methodology and Publisher Disclosure below.

Hach & Rose secured an $11.7 million jury verdict for an NYPD officer whose career was ended by unsafe conditions — a result consistent with a firm whose founding partners built their practice on union labor and workplace safety.

Origin and Background

Hach & Rose, LLP practices in Manhattan, confirmed through the firm’s own site and independent listings. Founded roughly 25 years ago by Gregory Hach and Michael Rose, the firm pairs two distinct backgrounds: Hach grew up in the labor movement — his father a respected New York labor leader — and represented union members nationally before founding the firm, while Rose was already known for million-dollar jury verdicts and as a speaker for the New York Bar. Rose earned his J.D. from New England Law in 1996 and holds Martindale-Hubbell’s AV Preeminent rating.

Practice Concentration

The firm concentrates on plaintiff-side personal injury with a pronounced labor and union orientation: construction accidents, workplace injuries, motor vehicle accidents, premises liability, medical malpractice, and municipal liability, with multilingual staff serving the five boroughs. See this New York Personal Injury directory for how this union-rooted practice compares to general consumer firms serving the five boroughs.

Notable Work / Track Record

Reported results include the $11.7 million NYPD officer verdict, a $25 million auto accident settlement, multiple eight-figure construction accident verdicts, a $6 million verdict for a construction worker hurt in a ladder fall, and an $8.5 million medical malpractice result. Michael Rose’s biography states he secured the largest New York construction-site accident jury verdict of 2012, and the firm reports total recoveries well in excess of $1 billion. Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Client Voice

Published client accounts describe partner responsiveness and preparation; one couple wrote that the firm’s team was “responsive, prepared, and ready to answer our questions” throughout. Awesome Attorneys did not identify a pattern of negative reviews warranting disclosure.

Beyond the Courtroom

Rose is a frequent lecturer to the bar on construction-site accidents, vocational rehabilitation, and expert witness examination, and the firm’s staffing reflects its multilingual client base.

Recognition for This New York Personal Injury Firm

Michael Rose holds the AV Preeminent peer rating including its Judicial Edition, Best Lawyers selections for 2026 and 2027, and New York Metro Super Lawyers recognition; the firm has appeared in Best Lawyers’ top-firm listings — peer- and judiciary-reviewed credentials distinct from paid marketing placements, which Awesome Attorneys distinguishes from the assorted commercial “top 10” plaques the firm also lists. New York State does not operate a state-run attorney specialization certification program, so Awesome Attorneys does not apply “specialist” language to any New York profile on a state-certification basis.

New York Legal Backdrop

Construction workers injured in elevation-related accidents — a core Hach & Rose docket — benefit from Labor Law Section 240(1)’s near-strict liability and Section 241(6)’s Industrial Code protections, and injured union members’ third-party claims proceed alongside workers’ compensation rather than being barred by it. Claims involving City defendants, including the NYPD, require a 90-day notice of claim under General Municipal Law Section 50-e. Most other claims run three years under CPLR 214(5) with pure comparative negligence under CPLR 1411. None of this is legal advice; a specific workplace or injury claim should be evaluated by a licensed New York attorney based on the actual facts involved.

Awesome Attorneys Assessment

Hach & Rose’s clearest differentiator is authentic labor lineage: a founding partner raised inside New York’s union movement, paired with a trial partner whose verdicts include a year’s largest construction-site result — a combination that maps directly onto the city’s injured-worker population. The honest trade-off is that the firm’s recognition list mixes strong peer credentials with commercial marketing awards, and Awesome Attorneys weights only the former; prospective clients should do the same. For an injured union member, construction worker, or officer with a workplace-safety claim, this firm’s roots and results make it a natural shortlist entry.

Methodology and Sourcing

This profile was researched from Hach & Rose’s own site and attorney biographies, its published verdict announcements, its FindLaw and Martindale-Hubbell profiles, and independent editorial coverage.

Publisher Disclosure and Independence Notice

Awesome Attorneys is an independent legal directory and editorial publication. This profile was not paid for, commissioned, or reviewed by Hach & Rose, LLP prior to publication. Awesome Attorneys may in the future offer sponsored placement products to attorneys and firms, including this one, but sponsorship has no bearing on the editorial content, inclusion, or findings of this profile.

Related legal guides

Browse all guides →

Practice areas:
Cities:

Attorney profiles are published for information only. Awesome Attorneys is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and a listing here is not an endorsement or a guarantee of any outcome. Sponsored placements are paid attorney advertising and are clearly labeled. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.