Send a quick message
Attorney Advertising. The information on this profile does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading it. Past results described do not guarantee similar outcomes.
At a Glance
| Firm | Griffith Barbee PLLC |
| Key attorneys | Casey Griffith, Michael Barbee |
| Office | 1722 Routh Street, Suite 910, Dallas, TX 75201 (One Arts Plaza, Dallas Arts District) |
| Focus | IP litigation (patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets) and commercial litigation |
| Founded | 2016 (9 years in practice as of this profile) |
| Recognition | Chambers Regional Spotlight Texas (top small-to-mid-size IP firm); Casey Griffith, Texas Super Lawyer, 10 consecutive years through 2023 |
| Fee structure | Hourly and alternative fee arrangements for select cases |
Origin & Founder History
Griffith Barbee was formed by experienced Dallas trial lawyers as a dedicated boutique for intellectual property and commercial litigation, headquartered in downtown Dallas’s Arts District at One Arts Plaza. Casey Griffith has been selected to Texas Super Lawyers for IP Litigation for 10 consecutive years through 2023, a sustained peer-recognition streak. The firm has grown to add a second office in Waco, positioning it to serve as lead or local counsel in the Waco Division of the Western District of Texas — a federal court that has become a significant venue for patent infringement litigation nationally.
Practice Concentration
The firm’s practice centers on IP litigation across patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets, representing companies, entrepreneurs, and creative professionals across industries from technology and medical innovation to fashion and entertainment. Griffith Barbee handles matters in federal and Texas state courts, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), and in ADR forums. The firm also provides IP prosecution and counseling and acts as Texas local counsel for out-of-state firms navigating Texas federal courts’ local rules and customs — a role requiring genuine familiarity with the state’s distinct district-court practices.
Track Record
The firm describes itself as having “a flawless track record” with a combined 30-plus years of IP litigation experience — the firm’s own characterization rather than an independently audited claim. One attributed client review describes small-business owner facing an unexpected federal trademark infringement lawsuit “in another state,” crediting Michael Barbee and senior associate Ashley with strength, strategy, compassion, and thorough knowledge in resolving the matter.
Client Voice
The trademark-defense review above is a genuine, individually attributed client account describing the emotional and practical difficulty of being served with a federal lawsuit unexpectedly, and specifically praising the firm’s responsiveness and the clarity with which complicated trademark law was explained throughout the case.
Beyond the Courtroom
Griffith Barbee was identified by Chambers in its inaugural Regional Spotlight Texas list as a top small-to-mid-size intellectual property firm — a notable, independently conferred recognition given Chambers’ selectivity. The firm sponsored the stage at a recent Dallas Bar Association Bench Bar Conference and actively participates in the local legal community.
Recognition
Casey Griffith’s 10 consecutive years on the Texas Super Lawyers list for IP Litigation (through 2023) is a genuine, independently verified peer-recognition streak. The firm has also been recognized among Best Lawyers in Dallas and in U.S. News & World Report’s Best Law Firms. No Texas Board of Legal Specialization certification was located for either named partner as of this profile’s research; the firm’s standing rests on these peer-review and publication-based recognitions rather than a TBLS credential.
Texas Legal Backdrop
The Waco Division of the Western District of Texas, where Griffith Barbee maintains a second office, became one of the nation’s most active patent-litigation venues in the years following changes in how patent cases were assigned there, making local counsel familiarity with that specific court’s procedures a genuinely valuable, non-generic credential. Texas also has its own Business Court, a relatively new specialized forum whose expanding role in intellectual property and trade secret disputes has been a subject of ongoing commentary among Texas IP litigators. None of this is legal advice; a party involved in patent litigation should consult counsel about the specific venue and forum considerations that apply.
Awesome Attorneys Assessment
Griffith Barbee’s differentiator is a genuinely dual-purpose litigation practice: IP litigation combined with local-counsel expertise for out-of-state firms navigating Texas’s federal courts, including the high-volume Waco patent docket — a specific, checkable niche that few Dallas-based boutiques occupy as directly. Casey Griffith’s decade-long Super Lawyers streak reflects sustained peer regard in a competitive field.
The honest trade-off is that this is a litigation-first boutique rather than a full-service prosecution shop — a client whose primary need is routine trademark or patent filing and portfolio management, rather than active or anticipated litigation, may be better served by a firm built around prosecution volume. For a business facing an active IP dispute or needing genuine Texas trial counsel, Griffith Barbee’s litigation focus and Waco-specific experience are real assets.
Methodology & Sourcing
This profile was compiled from the firm’s own website (griffithbarbee.com), its practice-area pages for IP litigation, patents, copyrights, and Texas local counsel, LinkedIn and Facebook business pages, Yelp and Attorney At Law client reviews, and Chambers’ Regional Spotlight Texas recognition. The client review quoted is independently hosted and individually attributed.
Publisher Disclosure & Independence Notice
This profile is an independent editorial article published by Awesome Attorneys. Awesome Attorneys does not endorse, recommend, or warrant any lawyer or law firm profiled on this site, and inclusion in this series is not paid placement. Facts in this profile were researched from public sources as described in the Methodology & Sourcing section and are current only as of the research date.