Attorney Advertising. This profile is independent editorial content produced by Awesome Attorneys and is not a paid placement. Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice or creates an attorney-client relationship. See our Methodology and Publisher Disclosure below.

Mohr IP Law: Flat-Fee Patents From a Team of PhDs and a Law Professor

Mohr IP Law Solutions built its practice around a specific promise most patent firms don’t make: knowing the fee for a patent application from the outset, with no worry about costs climbing beyond what was quoted. The firm backs that pricing model with attorneys who hold PhDs, engineering professorships, and law faculty credentials — not just USPTO registration.

Origin and Background

Mohr IP Law, P.C. is based at 501 Congress Avenue, Suite 150, Austin, TX 78701, operating since 2009 with additional offices in Portland, Salt Lake City, Denver, and Seattle. The firm’s attorneys include PhDs, registered patent attorneys, engineering professors, and a law professor, and each attorney holds a technical degree in science or engineering, since patent law forms a major component of the practice.

Practice Concentration

The firm’s practice covers utility patents, design patents, provisional and nonprovisional patent applications, trademarks, and copyrights, with attorneys bringing industry experience across chemical engineering, computer engineering, and chemical diagnostics fields. Mohr IP Law’s registered patent attorneys prepare patent applications optimized for USPTO examination, aiming to reduce prosecution expenses and improve enforceability, and the firm offers flat-fee patent applications so clients know costs from the outset rather than facing open-ended hourly billing. See this Austin Intellectual Property directory for how this flat-fee, technically credentialed patent practice compares to hourly-billed IP firms.

Notable Work / Track Record

As a patent prosecution firm serving individual inventors and businesses, Mohr IP Law does not publish a running table of case-specific outcome figures, and Awesome Attorneys did not identify one. The firm’s own published portfolio includes sample patents, trademarks, copyrights, and litigation work across its practice areas, along with client highlight case studies documenting specific client outcomes, though these are self-published examples rather than independently adjudicated results.

Client Voice

Awesome Attorneys did not locate a substantial independent consumer review platform sample for this firm. Its public track record is documented substantially through its own published portfolio and client highlights rather than a high-volume independent review aggregator presence. Awesome Attorneys discloses this gap directly.

Beyond the Courtroom

Several of the firm’s attorneys hold academic positions, including engineering professors and a law professor, reflecting sustained engagement with legal and technical education beyond direct client representation, though Awesome Attorneys did not identify additional named civic or nonprofit board service.

Recognition for This Austin IP Firm

Awesome Attorneys did not identify third-party peer-review awards (such as Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, or Chambers rankings) for this firm’s attorneys. The firm’s attorneys’ documented technical credentials — PhDs, engineering professorships, and law faculty positions, alongside USPTO patent attorney registration — are independently verifiable through the firm’s own attorney biography pages and represent genuine academic and technical qualifications distinct from formal peer-review recognition.

Texas Legal Backdrop

Patent prosecution before the USPTO operates under federal law regardless of state, and Mohr IP Law’s flat-fee pricing model addresses a genuine practical concern for Texas inventors and small businesses: patent application costs can otherwise escalate significantly under open-ended hourly billing, particularly when an application requires multiple rounds of USPTO office action responses. Texas trade secret protections under the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act remain a separate, complementary consideration for inventors deciding what to patent publicly versus protect as a trade secret. None of this is legal advice; a specific patent, trademark, or IP matter should be evaluated by a licensed attorney based on the actual facts involved.

Awesome Attorneys Assessment

Mohr IP Law’s clearest differentiator is the combination of genuinely deep technical credentials — PhD-holding attorneys, engineering professors, and a law professor among its ranks — with flat-fee pricing that gives clients cost certainty most patent firms don’t offer. The honest trade-off is that Awesome Attorneys did not identify third-party peer-review recognition (Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, Chambers) for this firm’s attorneys, and did not locate a substantial independent review sample to characterize client satisfaction at scale. For an inventor or small business that wants technically credentialed patent counsel with predictable, transparent costs rather than open-ended hourly billing, that flat-fee model paired with genuine academic depth is a strong basis for a shortlist.

Methodology and Sourcing

This profile was researched from Mohr IP Law’s own website (firm overview, attorney staff page, practice area pages for utility and design patents, and portfolio/client highlights page).

Publisher Disclosure and Independence Notice

Awesome Attorneys is an independent legal directory and editorial publication. This profile was not paid for, commissioned, or reviewed by Mohr IP Law, P.C. or its attorneys prior to publication. Awesome Attorneys may in the future offer sponsored placement products to attorneys and firms, including this one, but sponsorship has no bearing on the editorial content, inclusion, or findings of this profile.