Send a quick message
Attorney Advertising. The information on this profile does not constitute legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading it. Past results described do not guarantee similar outcomes.
At a Glance
| Firm | Henley & Henley, P.C. |
| Founded | 2001, by Geoff J. Henley and Hudson Henley |
| Real estate lead | Hudson Henley — Real Estate Law and Title Law |
| Office | 2520 Fairmount Street, Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75201 |
| Focus | Real estate transactions and title, foreclosure (both homeowner defense and lender/bank workout representation), landlord-tenant, commercial litigation |
| Notable context | Hudson Henley is also a large-scale active multifamily real estate investor/operator through a separate entity, Henley Capital |
| Fee structure | Not publicly posted; contact firm directly |
Origin & Founder History
Hudson Henley was born on a Naval base in the San Francisco Bay Area, the son of a Navy officer, and relocated to Dallas at age three. He earned a political science degree from the University of North Texas in 1988, then graduated with honors from the University of Texas School of Law in 1991 and was admitted to the Texas State Bar that year (and to the California State Bar in 2000). After working in Austin and briefly co-founding a firm with a law school classmate, Henley went independent, and by age 29 had built a civil litigation practice — focused mostly on personal injury — with 25 employees. He and Geoff J. Henley founded Henley & Henley, P.C. in 2001.
Geoff J. Henley began his legal career as an assistant district attorney in 1997 and has since tried more than 100 cases to verdict across personal injury, toxic torts, nursing home litigation, and criminal defense, with admissions before the Texas Supreme Court and the Northern and Southern Districts of Texas. While Geoff’s practice centers on litigation outside real estate, Hudson’s has, in the firm’s own words, “become more focused in recent years” on real estate law and title work.
Practice Concentration
Hudson Henley’s real estate practice spans transactional and litigation work: property damage claims, insurance disputes, boundary disputes, contested appraisals, breach-of-contract suits tied to real estate deals, condemnation proceedings, failure-to-close disputes, title defects, breach of warranty, construction defects, liens, foreclosure, adverse possession, and recording issues. On foreclosure specifically, the firm represents both sides of the relationship depending on the engagement: it defends homeowners facing foreclosure and separately represents banks, mortgage companies, and lending institutions pursuing recovery, workout negotiations, and non-judicial and judicial foreclosures against defaulting borrowers. This is a genuine dual-representation practice, and it is disclosed here explicitly: a prospective client should ask directly which side of a given matter the firm would be representing them on, and confirm there is no conflict with a specific counterparty.
A separate and relevant fact for readers: Hudson Henley is also personally a large-scale, active real estate investor and operator, principal of Henley Capital, which by public mortgage-filing records has been linked to more than 280 properties and roughly $150 million in recorded mortgage exposure across dozens of holding entities in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, concentrated in multifamily acquisitions. The firm’s marketing frames this as a client-service asset — an attorney who “understands the needs of property investors and lenders from personal experience” — and that framing is reasonable, but it is a genuinely dual role (practicing real estate attorney and active real estate principal) that this profile discloses rather than omits.
Track Record
No independently verifiable settlement or verdict figures specific to the real estate practice were located for this profile; Geoff Henley’s 100-plus trials to verdict are documented in the firm’s attorney biography but span his personal injury, criminal, and toxic-tort work rather than real estate matters specifically.
Client Voice
Awesome Attorneys did not locate individually attributed, third-party-verified client reviews specific to Hudson Henley’s real estate practice as of this profile’s research. This is disclosed directly rather than filled in with unverified marketing claims.
Beyond the Courtroom
Both Henley brothers are active in Dallas legal and trial-lawyer professional organizations, including the American Association for Justice, Texas Trial Lawyers Association, Dallas Trial Lawyers Association, and Dallas Bar Association. Hudson Henley’s parallel real estate investment career, through Henley Capital, includes stewardship of a self-managed portfolio the firm states exceeds $300 million in asset value across more than 15 completed multifamily investment cycles.
Recognition
No Texas Board of Legal Specialization certification in Real Estate Law was located for Hudson Henley as of this profile’s research; no peer-review service rating (Martindale-Hubbell AV, Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers) was independently confirmed for either Henley brother in connection with the real estate practice specifically. This is disclosed plainly rather than assumed.
Texas Legal Backdrop
Non-judicial foreclosure in Texas — the more common route lenders use — is governed by Texas Property Code § 51.002, which sets notice, posting, and sale-timing requirements a lender must satisfy before a substitute trustee’s sale can proceed; a homeowner facing foreclosure has a narrow window to raise defects in that process. Adverse possession claims, occasionally relevant in boundary and title disputes, run under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code §§ 16.021–16.028, which set different limitations periods depending on whether the claimant has color of title, a recorded deed, or neither. Title defects and quiet-title actions draw on the recording framework in Texas Property Code Chapter 13. None of this is legal advice; a homeowner facing a specific foreclosure notice should consult counsel promptly given the short statutory timelines involved.
Awesome Attorneys Assessment
Henley & Henley’s real estate practice, through Hudson Henley, offers a genuinely useful market perspective: an attorney who is simultaneously a large-scale multifamily investor brings a practical understanding of deal structure and lender relationships that a purely transactional attorney without personal investment experience may lack.
Two honest trade-offs deserve equal weight in that same sentence. First, the firm’s foreclosure practice represents both homeowners and the lending institutions pursuing them — not on the same matter, but as a matter of firm-wide business — so any prospective client should confirm directly there is no conflict before engaging the firm on a foreclosure-adjacent matter. Second, Hudson Henley’s substantial personal real estate investment activity, while framed by the firm as an asset, also means a client should understand that their attorney has independent, significant financial interests in the same regional real estate market their transaction sits within — a fact worth naming plainly rather than leaving unstated. Neither of these is disqualifying, but both are the kind of specific, checkable facts a client should weigh before retaining any dual-role attorney-investor.
Methodology & Sourcing
This profile was compiled from the firm’s own website (henleylawpc.com), attorney biography pages for Geoff J. Henley and Hudson Henley, Henley Capital’s own team page, public real estate investment and mortgage-filing aggregation (Elementix), State Bar of Texas and California State Bar licensing records, and professional-association listings. The property-count and mortgage-exposure figures for Hudson Henley’s personal investment activity are drawn from a third-party public-records aggregator and are current only as of that source’s stated date; Awesome Attorneys did not independently verify each underlying filing.
Publisher Disclosure & Independence Notice
This profile is an independent editorial article published by Awesome Attorneys. Awesome Attorneys does not endorse, recommend, or warrant any lawyer or law firm profiled on this site, and inclusion in this series is not paid placement. Facts in this profile were researched from public sources as described in the Methodology & Sourcing section and are current only as of the research date.