Send a quick message
A NOTE TO READERS. This profile was researched and written independently by Awesome Attorneys’ editorial team. Sammartino Law Group, P.L.L.C. did not pay for, request, or review this article prior to publication, and placement on Awesome Attorneys’ editorial pages cannot be purchased. Nothing in this article is legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney–client relationship. Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict the outcome of any future case.
At a Glance
| Firm | Sammartino Law Group, P.L.L.C. |
| Attorney | Carl Raymond Sammartino, Owner |
| Office | 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 708, Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| Focus | Eminent domain, condemnation, and private property rights defense throughout southern Arizona |
| Education | J.D., James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona |
| Certification | State Bar of Arizona Certified Specialist in Real Estate Law |
Sources: firm website (sammartinogroup.com), State Bar of Arizona Board of Legal Specialization roster, Justia, aggregate review platforms. Compiled August 2026.
Origin
A Narrow Practice, Built on One Side of the Table
Carl Sammartino began his career as an associate at Stubbs & Schubart, P.C. in Tucson before founding Sammartino Law Group. His own site states his entire legal career has focused on “defending the private property rights of southern Arizona landowners” against government condemnation and eminent domain actions — a client-side, not government-side, practice.
Practice
Eminent Domain, Condemnation, and Zoning
Per the firm’s own site, Sammartino represents property owners and lessees in eminent domain and condemnation proceedings, zoning and land use disputes, and general real estate matters, and states he has represented clients in every county in southern Arizona.
Track Record
No independently verifiable, itemized case-result compilation was located in the sources reviewed for this profile. Eminent domain compensation awards are case-specific and depend on appraised property value, making a general results list of limited use without individual case citations, which were not located.
Past-Results Disclaimer: Every case is different, and no past result guarantees a similar outcome in any future matter.
Client Voice
A review aggregator summary describes client praise for Sammartino’s “professionalism, accessible communication, and sympathy for customers,” noting he “simplifies property law concerns.” This profile treats that as a secondary-source summary rather than a directly attributed, dated quote, since the underlying individual reviews were not independently located.
Community
Sammartino has spoken at the Regional Forum on Homelessness, per his professional biography; no further independently verifiable community involvement was located in the sources reviewed for this profile.
Recognition
Sammartino holds the State Bar of Arizona’s Board of Legal Specialization certification in real estate law — a peer-reviewed, examination-based credential distinct from purchased marketing-list placements. This profile uses the word “specialist” advisedly, on the strength of that documented, individually attributed certification.
The Arizona Legal Backdrop
What follows is general legal information, not legal advice.
Arizona’s eminent domain protections were substantially strengthened by 2006’s Proposition 207, codified in the state’s Private Property Rights Protection Act, A.R.S. § 12-1131 et seq., which requires government compensation not just for outright takings but for regulatory actions that reduce property value. Condemnation proceedings themselves generally follow Arizona’s eminent domain procedure statutes under A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 8.
The Awesome Attorneys Assessment
Sammartino Law Group’s differentiator is genuine niche depth — a solo, board-certified real estate specialist who has built an entire practice around defending property owners against government takings, rather than a general real estate shop that occasionally handles condemnation. The honest trade-off: a solo practice concentrated on one specific dispute type has limited capacity for unrelated real estate work, such as routine residential closings, and clients with a different kind of real estate matter should confirm fit before engaging.
Methodology & Sourcing
This profile was researched in August 2026 from the firm’s own website, Justia, aggregate attorney review platforms, and the State Bar of Arizona’s Board of Legal Specialization public roster. Sammartino Law Group, P.L.L.C. did not commission, review, or pay for this profile.
Publisher Disclosure & Independence Notice
This profile is an independent editorial article published by Awesome Attorneys. Awesome Attorneys does not endorse, recommend, or warrant any lawyer or law firm profiled on this site, and inclusion in this series is not paid placement.