Dieker Copple: The Scottsdale Firm Built Entirely Around Insurance Bad Faith

READER NOTICE. This profile is independent editorial content produced by Awesome Attorneys. No law firm can purchase placement in, or influence over, our editorial series; sponsored features on Awesome Attorneys are always labeled as such. This article is general information about a law firm — it is not legal advice, and reading it creates no attorney–client relationship. Case results depend on the unique facts and law of each matter; past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future matter.

At a Glance — Dieker Copple, PLLC

Origin

Douglas Dieker has been licensed to practice in Arizona since 1997, per Arizona State Bar records reflected in third-party licensing databases, and practices in a split between personal injury and health law. The firm’s public branding — “Experienced Trial Lawyers dedicated to serving victims of insurance bad faith and medical malpractice” — signals a narrower focus than a general accident practice. Name partner S. Christopher Copple sits on the Arizona Association for Justice’s board of directors, the state’s plaintiff-bar trial lawyers’ association, which is a genuine plaintiff-side affiliation rather than a purchased award.

Practice Areas

The firm’s own materials describe its work as centered on insurance dispute resolution and litigation — specifically insurance bad faith, where an insurer is alleged to have unreasonably denied, delayed, or underpaid a valid claim — alongside medical malpractice and general personal injury matters including wrongful death.

Track Record

We did not locate a published, itemized table of verdicts or settlements on the firm’s public materials at the time of writing. Insurance bad-faith litigation frequently resolves under confidential settlement terms, which can limit what any firm is able to publish about specific case outcomes; that is a feature of the practice area, not necessarily a gap unique to this firm, but it means prospective clients should ask directly about comparable-case results rather than relying on a published table.

Client Voice

A Facebook review referenced a client who “used their services with my insurance claim” and “referred [the firm] to multiple friends and family who have had great results,” and a separate reviewer described the firm as “incredibly caring” and willing to “do the work and fight the fight.” These are attributed, firm-linked reviews rather than results independently verified against court records.

Community

Beyond S. Christopher Copple’s board seat with the Arizona Association for Justice — itself a form of professional community involvement within the plaintiff bar — we did not identify additional documented civic or pro bono activity specific to this firm at the time of writing.

Recognition

No Arizona State Bar Board of Legal Specialization certification was identified for either named attorney. AzAJ board membership is a genuine plaintiff-bar leadership credential, distinct from pay-to-play marketing awards, and is noted as such here.

Arizona Legal Backdrop

Arizona personal injury claims generally carry a two-year statute of limitations under A.R.S. § 12-542. Claims against a public entity require a notice of claim within 180 days (A.R.S. § 12-821.01) and suit within one year (A.R.S. § 12-821). Insurance bad-faith claims arise under Arizona common law rather than a single dedicated statute, and carry their own procedural nuances that a specialized attorney should address directly. Arizona applies pure comparative negligence under A.R.S. § 12-2505. This is general information, not legal advice.

The Awesome Attorneys Assessment

Dieker Copple’s differentiator is genuine specialization: a firm built around insurance bad-faith litigation, a practice area that rewards attorneys who understand insurance-company claims-handling practices from the inside, rather than a general accident-and-injury caseload. The trade-off of that focus is scale — this is a small, niche practice, not a firm equipped to run a high volume of routine auto-accident cases simultaneously. It’s a strong fit for someone whose primary dispute is with their own insurer over how a claim was handled, and a less obvious first call for a straightforward car-accident injury claim against another driver.

Methodology & Sourcing

Sourced from the firm’s website (diekerlawfirm.com), its Facebook business page, Lawyer.com and Lawyer Legion attorney-licensing listings, and the Arizona Association for Justice’s published board of directors roster. No court-record verdict search was performed. Awesome Attorneys did not contact the firm directly in the preparation of this profile.

Publisher Disclosure & Independence Notice

Awesome Attorneys is an independent legal-directory publisher. This profile was not paid for, commissioned, reviewed, or approved by Dieker Copple, PLLC prior to publication.