AWESOME ATTORNEYS
INDEPENDENT EDITORIAL · FIRM PROFILES · PEORIA, ARIZONA
AVISO DE PUBLICIDAD DE ABOGADOS. This profile was researched and written independently by Awesome Attorneys’ editorial team. It was not paid for, commissioned, or reviewed prior to publication by the firm profiled. All case results, recoveries, and recognitions described below are attributed to their sources. Past results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. This article is for general information only and is not legal advice; reading it does not create an attorney–client relationship.
The Father-Son Team That Never Stopped Taking the Small Case
Inside Garrison Law Firm, the Peoria practice where Kevin Garrison has spent more than three decades fighting for Arizona’s injured — and where the published results run from million-dollar trucking claims down to a single $94,000 auto case, itemized in public.
BY THE AWESOME ATTORNEYS EDITORIAL TEAM · PEORIA, ARIZONA · JULY 2026
GARRISON LAW FIRM — AT A GLANCE
| FUNDADA POR | Kevin Garrison, who began practicing personal injury law in Phoenix in 1988 and established the firm in 1994 (per the firm and Avvo) |
| ENFOQUE | Plaintiff-side personal injury: car, truck, and motorcycle accidents; nursing home abuse; medical and dental malpractice; wrongful death; dog bites |
| OFICINA | 7972 W. Thunderbird Rd., Ste. 107, Peoria, Arizona |
| RESULTADOS EMBLEMÁTICOS | 3,000+ cases resolved and more than $75 million in settlements and verdicts (per the firm) |
| VENTAJA DISTINTIVA | A father-son team — Kevin and Daniel Garrison — with a publicly itemized case-results page running from seven figures down to five, an unusual level of transparency for a firm this size |
| MODELO DE HONORARIOS | Contingency only (per the firm) |
| CONOCIDA POR | Taking cases — including modest-value auto claims — that larger volume firms often decline (per the firm) |
Sources: garrisonlawfirm.com (firm website, including its Case Results page), Avvo, the National Trial Lawyers. Compiled July 2026.
ORIGEN
A Career That Predates the Firm’s Name
Kevin Garrison began practicing personal injury law in Phoenix in 1988, according to his Avvo profile, and established the Garrison Law Firm six years later, in 1994. He is a graduate of the University of Arizona College of Law and the Arizona Trial College, and his firm biography states he is a past president of the Phoenix chapter of the Arizona Trial Lawyers. Over more than three decades, Garrison built a practice representing people injured by negligence — car and DUI collisions, dog bites, and, increasingly, institutional failures such as nursing home neglect.
His son, Daniel Garrison, joined the firm after graduating summa cum laude from Arizona State University and earning a full-ride scholarship to the William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, per the firm’s about page. Daniel had worked part-time at the firm since his undergraduate years and is licensed to practice in both Arizona and Nevada. The firm’s stated mission — “fighting the good fight to seek out justice for those who deserve it, against those who would try to deny them” — is attributed to Daniel on the firm’s website.
PRÁCTICA
Where Garrison Law Firm Concentrates
The firm’s website lists dedicated practice pages for car accidents, trucking accidents, motorcycle accidents, pedestrian accidents, bicycle accidents, slip and fall, dog bite injury, medical malpractice, DUI-related injury, wrongful death, and nursing home abuse. Unlike firms whose case lists skew toward a single high-value category, Garrison’s published results — discussed below — span both catastrophic claims and everyday accident cases, a mix the firm frames as evidence that no case is too small to take seriously.
HISTORIAL
El tablero de resultados
Garrison Law Firm publishes an unusually granular case-results page listing dozens of individual settlements and verdicts by dollar figure and case type. The firm states it has resolved more than 3,000 cases and recovered more than $75 million for clients. A representative sample, as published by the firm:
| RESULTADO | TIPO |
|---|---|
| $2,000,000 | Lawsuit against a trucking company |
| $1,450,000 | Automobile collision resulting in serious injuries |
| $1,300,000 | Case against a drunk driver |
| $1,275,000 | Pedestrian struck by a driver |
| $1,000,000 | Dental malpractice |
| $875,000 | Medical malpractice resulting in wrongful death |
| $585,000 | Claim against a bar (over-service) |
| $400,000 | Drowning case |
| $200,000–$390,000 (multiple) | Nursing home, wrongful death, and medical malpractice matters |
| $94,000–$180,000 (multiple) | Automobile accidents, dog bites, and pedestrian cases |
Source: garrisonlawfirm.com/case-results, retrieved July 2026. Past results do not guarantee or predict future outcomes; every case is unique.
The presence of five- and six-figure results alongside the million-dollar entries is worth noting on its own. Many firms’ public results pages are curated to show only their largest wins; Garrison’s list reads more like an actual docket, including a $94,000 auto case and several $115,000 nursing home and accident matters.
LA VOZ DEL CLIENTE
Lo que reportan los clientes
The firm’s website publishes a rotating set of client reviews, each attributed to a first name and last initial. Kimberlee C. writes that Garrison “took the time to review my file from Peterson & Johnson and worked it until he overturned any doubt from the other law firm,” describing him as “a strong attorney that cares.” Noah B. describes getting into a car accident and being seen by Garrison the next day, calling him “very helpful and consultative” and noting he “didn’t take too much of” the settlement. George H. thanks Garrison for handling his daughter’s accident and “took all the worry out of our hands.” Gustav S. calls him “relentless in fighting for the little guy” and “not afraid to standup to major corporations.”
Independent aggregator Wheree, summarizing publicly available reviews, reports that clients frequently praise the firm’s ability to negotiate settlements “significantly beyond initial offers” and describe the staff as communicative and responsive throughout the case process.
COMUNIDAD
Más allá de la sala del tribunal
Kevin Garrison’s firm biography states that he has supported charitable organizations and programs benefiting the underprivileged in the Peoria and greater Phoenix community throughout his career, though the firm’s public materials do not name specific organizations or provide dollar figures for that involvement. His decades-long service in Arizona Trial Lawyers leadership — including his term as past president of the Phoenix chapter — reflects an ongoing role in the state’s plaintiffs’ bar beyond his own casework.
RECONOCIMIENTOS
Posición entre colegas
Kevin Garrison is listed as an Arizona member of the National Trial Lawyers’ Top 100, an attorney-membership organization that publishes state-by-state rosters of trial lawyers. Readers should note that Top 100 membership organizations of this kind are typically paid or invitation-based professional associations rather than a blind peer-review process of the kind used by Super Lawyers or Best Lawyers; Awesome Attorneys did not find a listing for Garrison in either of those two more rigorously vetted directories at the time of writing. His credentials that are independently verifiable include his 1988 admission to Arizona personal injury practice and his past presidency of the Phoenix chapter of the Arizona Trial Lawyers, a state bar-adjacent professional association.
LA LEY
El contexto legal de Arizona, en lenguaje sencillo
Readers considering a personal injury claim in Arizona should understand a few ground rules that shape every case a firm like Garrison Law Firm handles. What follows is general information, not legal advice.
El reloj de dos años. Arizona’s statute of limitations for personal injury claims is generally two years from the date of injury (A.R.S. § 12-542).
Demandar al gobierno es más rápido y más estricto. Claims against Arizona public entities require a formal notice of claim within 180 days (A.R.S. § 12-821.01) and a lawsuit within one year (A.R.S. § 12-821).
La culpa se comparte, no es todo o nada. Arizona follows pure comparative negligence (A.R.S. § 12-2505): an injured person’s recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault, but not eliminated even if they were mostly at fault.
Los menores tienen más tiempo. The limitations clock is generally paused for minors and people of unsound mind until the disability ends (A.R.S. § 12-502) — relevant in cases involving injured children.
EVALUACIÓN
La perspectiva de Awesome Attorneys
Garrison Law Firm’s published case list is its strongest evidence: a genuinely mixed docket that includes modest-value automobile claims most volume-focused firms would route to a junior associate or decline outright, alongside seven-figure trucking and malpractice recoveries. That range, combined with more than three decades of continuous practice under one attorney and a father-son structure that keeps the firm small, suggests a practice built on relationship and follow-through rather than intake volume.
The honest trade-off: this is a two-attorney firm without the depth bench of the state’s largest injury practices, and its recognition profile leans on membership-style organizations rather than the more rigorously peer-vetted directories some competitors can claim. For clients whose priority is a lawyer who will personally handle their file — whether the claim is worth $94,000 or $2 million — Garrison Law Firm’s own results page makes a credible case for itself.
METODOLOGÍA E INDEPENDENCIA
This profile was researched and written independently by Awesome Attorneys’ editorial team in July 2026. Primary source: the firm’s own published website (garrisonlawfirm.com), including its Case Results and About Us pages. Secondary sources: Avvo and the National Trial Lawyers. Garrison Law Firm did not commission, pay for, or pre-approve this article. All case results are attributed to the firm’s own reporting; past results do not guarantee or predict future outcomes. This article is general information, not legal advice.
© 2026 Awesome Attorneys. Contenido editorial independiente. Las ubicaciones patrocinadas en Awesome Attorneys siempre están claramente etiquetadas; esta no es una de ellas.
Declaración del editor & aviso de independencia
Este perfil es un artículo editorial independiente publicado por Awesome Attorneys. Awesome Attorneys no respalda, recomienda ni garantiza a ningún abogado o bufete perfilado en este sitio, y la inclusión en esta serie no es una ubicación pagada. “Awesome Attorneys” es únicamente un nombre de marca; no es una calificación, clasificación ni afirmación de que algún bufete perfilado sea superior en ninguna categoría legal.
Awesome Attorneys mantiene un directorio de abogados separado. Solo las fichas allí marcadas como “Patrocinado” o “Anuncio” reflejan una relación pagada o patrocinada con Awesome Attorneys; este perfil editorial no es una ficha de ese tipo.
Los hechos, cifras y afirmaciones de este perfil se investigaron de forma independiente a partir de fuentes públicas, como se describe en la sección Metodología e independencia, y están vigentes únicamente a la fecha de la investigación; están sujetos a cambios sin previo aviso, y los lectores deben confirmar cualquier detalle directamente con la firma antes de basarse en él. Este aviso complementa, y no sustituye, el Aviso de Publicidad de Abogados en la parte superior de este perfil.